Re: [PATCH] tracing/probes: fix error check in parse_btf_field()

From: Google
Date: Sun May 26 2024 - 06:17:17 EST


On Sat, 25 May 2024 20:21:32 +0200
Carlos López <clopez@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> btf_find_struct_member() might return NULL or an error via the
> ERR_PTR() macro. However, its caller in parse_btf_field() only checks
> for the NULL condition. Fix this by using IS_ERR() and returning the
> error up the stack.
>

Thanks for finding it!
I think this requires new error message for error_log file.
Can you add the log as

trace_probe_log_err(ctx->offset, BTF_ERROR);

And define BTF_ERROR in ERRORS@kernel/trace/trace_probe.h ?

Thank you,

> Fixes: c440adfbe3025 ("tracing/probes: Support BTF based data structure field access")
> Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index 5e263c141574..5417e9712157 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -554,6 +554,8 @@ static int parse_btf_field(char *fieldname, const struct btf_type *type,
> anon_offs = 0;
> field = btf_find_struct_member(ctx->btf, type, fieldname,
> &anon_offs);
> + if (IS_ERR(field))
> + return PTR_ERR(field);
> if (!field) {
> trace_probe_log_err(ctx->offset, NO_BTF_FIELD);
> return -ENOENT;
> --
> 2.35.3
>


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>