Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8192e: remove unnecessary line breaks

[Nam Cao]

On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:19:27PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> Remove some unnecessary line breaks after '=' and '==' to improve
> readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c | 24 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> index 2fda44c5a412..5392d2daf870 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> @@ -1392,8 +1392,7 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_rx_path_sel_byrssi(struct net_device *dev)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			rf_num++;
> -			cur_cck_pwdb =
> -					dm_rx_path_sel_table.cck_pwdb_sta[i];
> +			cur_cck_pwdb = dm_rx_path_sel_table.cck_pwdb_sta[i];
>  
>  			if (rf_num == 1) {
>  				cck_rx_ver2_max_index = i;
> @@ -1412,27 +1411,20 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_rx_path_sel_byrssi(struct net_device *dev)
>  				}
>  			} else {
>  				if (cur_cck_pwdb > tmp_cck_max_pwdb) {
> -					tmp_cck_sec_pwdb =
> -							tmp_cck_max_pwdb;
> -					cck_rx_ver2_sec_index =
> -							cck_rx_ver2_max_index;
> +					tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = tmp_cck_max_pwdb;
> +					cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = cck_rx_ver2_max_index;
>  					tmp_cck_max_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
>  					cck_rx_ver2_max_index = i;
> -				} else if (cur_cck_pwdb ==
> -						tmp_cck_max_pwdb) {
> +				} else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_max_pwdb) {
>  					tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
>  					cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i;
>  				} else if (PWDB_IN_RANGE) {
>  					tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
>  					cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i;
> -				} else if (cur_cck_pwdb ==
> -						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) {
> -					if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb ==
> -						tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> -						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb =
> -								cur_cck_pwdb;
> -						cck_rx_ver2_sec_index =
> -								i;
> +				} else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) {
> +					if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> +						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> +						cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i;
>  					}
>  				} else if ((cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) &&
>  						(cur_cck_pwdb > tmp_cck_min_pwdb)) {

Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Nam