Re: [PATCH] mm: /proc/pid/smaps_rollup: avoid skipping vma after getting mmap_lock again

[David Hildenbrand]

Am 23.05.24 um 20:35 schrieb Yuanyuan Zhong:
> After switching smaps_rollup to use VMA iterator, searching for next
> entry is part of the condition expression of the do-while loop. So the
> current VMA needs to be addressed before the continue statement.
>
> Fixes: c4c84f06285e ("fs/proc/task_mmu: stop using linked list and highest_vm_end")
> Signed-off-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 9 +++++++--
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index e5a5f015ff03..f8d35f993fe5 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -970,12 +970,17 @@ static int show_smaps_rollup(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>   				break;
>   
>   			/* Case 1 and 2 above */
> -			if (vma->vm_start >= last_vma_end)
> +			if (vma->vm_start >= last_vma_end) {
> +				smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, 0);
> +				last_vma_end = vma->vm_end;
>   				continue;
> +			}
>   
>   			/* Case 4 above */
> -			if (vma->vm_end > last_vma_end)
> +			if (vma->vm_end > last_vma_end) {
>   				smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, last_vma_end);
> +				last_vma_end = vma->vm_end;
> +			}
>   		}
>   	} for_each_vma(vmi, vma);
>   

Looks correct to me. I guess getting a reproducer is rather tricky.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb