Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: irdma hardware init failed after suspend/resume

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Ricky,


Thank you for your patch. Some minor nits. It’d be great if you made the 
summary about the action and not an issue description. Maybe:

Avoid IRQ collision to fix init failure on ACPI S3 resume

Am 28.05.24 um 12:03 schrieb Ricky Wu:
> A bug in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218906 describes
> that irdma would break and report hardware initialization failed after
> suspend/resume with Intel E810 NIC (tested on 6.9.0-rc5).
>
> The problem is caused due to the collision between the irq numbers
> requested in irdma and the irq numbers requested in other drivers
> after suspend/resume.
>
> The irq numbers used by irdma are derived from ice's ice_pf->msix_entries
> which stores mappings between MSI-X index and Linux interrupt number.
> It's supposed to be cleaned up when suspend and rebuilt in resume but
> it's not, causing irdma using the old irq numbers stored in the old
> ice_pf->msix_entries to request_irq() when resume. And eventually
> collide with other drivers.
>
> This patch fixes this problem. On suspend, we call ice_deinit_rdma() to
> clean up the ice_pf->msix_entries (and free the MSI-X vectors used by
> irdma if we've dynamically allocated them). On Resume, we call

resume

> ice_init_rdma() to rebuild the ice_pf->msix_entries (and allocate the
> MSI-X vectors if we would like to dynamically allocate them).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricky Wu <en-wei.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Please add a Link: tag.

If this was tested by somebody else, please also add a Tested-by: line.

> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> index f60c022f7960..ec3cbadaa162 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> @@ -5544,7 +5544,7 @@ static int ice_suspend(struct device *dev)
>   	 */
>   	disabled = ice_service_task_stop(pf);
>   
> -	ice_unplug_aux_dev(pf);
> +	ice_deinit_rdma(pf);
>   
>   	/* Already suspended?, then there is nothing to do */
>   	if (test_and_set_bit(ICE_SUSPENDED, pf->state)) {
> @@ -5624,6 +5624,10 @@ static int ice_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	if (ret)
>   		dev_err(dev, "Cannot restore interrupt scheme: %d\n", ret);
>   
> +	ret = ice_init_rdma(pf);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "Reinitialize RDMA during resume failed: %d\n", ret);
> +
>   	clear_bit(ICE_DOWN, pf->state);
>   	/* Now perform PF reset and rebuild */
>   	reset_type = ICE_RESET_PFR;

What effect does this have on resume time?


Kind regards,

Paul