Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: page_type, zsmalloc and page_mapcount_reset()

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (24/05/29 13:18), David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Wanting to remove the remaining abuser of _mapcount/page_type along with
> page_mapcount_reset(), I stumbled over zsmalloc, which is yet to be
> converted away from "struct page" [1].
> 
> Unfortunately, we cannot stop using the page_type field in zsmalloc code
> completely for its own purposes. All other fields in "struct page" are
> used one way or the other. Could we simply store a 2-byte offset value
> at the beginning of each page? Likely, but that will require a bit more
> work; and once we have memdesc we might want to move the offset in there
> (struct zsalloc?) again.
> 
> ... but we can limit the abuse to 16 bit, glue it to a page type that
> must be set, and document it. page_has_type() will always successfully
> indicate such zsmalloc pages, and such zsmalloc pages only.
> 
> We lose zsmalloc support for PAGE_SIZE > 64KB, which should be tolerable.
> We could use more bits from the page type, but 16 bit sounds like a good
> idea for now.
> 
> So clarify the _mapcount/page_type documentation, use a proper page_type
> for zsmalloc, and remove page_mapcount_reset().
> 
> Briefly tested with zram on x86-64.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231130101242.2590384-1-42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> # zram/zsmalloc workloads