Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant temperature sensors

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Fri May 31 2024 - 23:40:24 EST


On 5/31/24 18:28, Wolfram Sang wrote:

+/* Return 0 if detection is successful, -ENODEV otherwise */
+static int spd5118_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
+{
+ struct i2c_adapter *adapter = client->adapter;
+ int regval;
+
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA |
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(client, SPD5118_REG_TYPE);
+ if (regval != 0x5118)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, SPD5118_REG_VENDOR);
+ if (regval < 0 || !spd5118_vendor_valid(regval & 0xff, regval >> 8))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_CAPABILITY);
+ if (regval < 0)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ if (!(regval & SPD5118_CAP_TS_SUPPORT) || (regval & 0xfc))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CLR);
+ if (regval)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_ERROR_CLR);
+ if (regval)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_REVISION);
+ if (regval < 0 || (regval & 0xc1))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_TEMP_CONFIG);
+ if (regval < 0)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ if (regval & ~SPD5118_TS_DISABLE)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ strscpy(info->type, "spd5118", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
+ return 0;
+}

What about adding DDR5 to i2c_register_spd() and dropping this function?


Yes, that should be the next step. I didn't want to do that here because it
would introduce a cross-subsystem dependency. Of course, that depends a bit
on your position about such dependencies. If I do that as part of this series,
would you Ack it, or would you want to handle that through the i2c tree ?

Guenter