Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct 'adt7316_limit_regs'

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Jonathan Cameron (jic23@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:45:03 +0200
> Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:00:55PM +0100, linux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > 'adt7316_limit_regs' has never been used since the original
> > > commit 35f6b6b86ede ("staging: iio: new ADT7316/7/8 and ADT7516/7/9
> > > driver").
> > > 
> > > The comment above it is a copy-and-paste from a different struct.
> > > 
> > > Remove both the struct and the comment.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Greg's bot is correct, but meh, not worth a v3.
> 
> I picked up Nuno's tag from v1 though. I don't think that came
> in after you'd sent this, so I guess you missed that one.
> 
> Applied.

Thanks!

Dave

> Jonathan
> 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 9 ---------
> > >  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > index 79467f056a05..f4260786d50a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> > > @@ -209,15 +209,6 @@ struct adt7316_chip_info {
> > >  #define ADT7316_TEMP_AIN_INT_MASK	\
> > >  	(ADT7316_TEMP_INT_MASK)
> > >  
> > > -/*
> > > - * struct adt7316_chip_info - chip specific information
> > > - */
> > > -
> > > -struct adt7316_limit_regs {
> > > -	u16	data_high;
> > > -	u16	data_low;
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  static ssize_t adt7316_show_enabled(struct device *dev,
> > >  				    struct device_attribute *attr,
> > >  				    char *buf)
> > > -- 
> > > 2.45.1
> > > 
> > >   
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
> > a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
> > to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> > writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> > created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> > in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> > kernel tree.
> > 
> > You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> > as indicated below:
> > 
> > - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
> >   did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
> >   Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
> >   kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
> >   needs to be done here to properly describe this.
> > 
> > If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> > how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> > Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> > from other developers.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h's patch email bot
> 
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/