[PATCH 5/6] wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Mon Jun 03 2024 - 05:17:19 EST


There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index ddc390d24ec1..16ab834185b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -4022,15 +4022,15 @@ void rtw89_core_update_beacon_work(struct work_struct *work)
int rtw89_wait_for_cond(struct rtw89_wait_info *wait, unsigned int cond)
{
struct completion *cmpl = &wait->completion;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
unsigned int cur;

cur = atomic_cmpxchg(&wait->cond, RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE, cond);
if (cur != RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE)
return -EBUSY;

- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(cmpl, RTW89_WAIT_FOR_COND_TIMEOUT);
- if (timeout == 0) {
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(cmpl, RTW89_WAIT_FOR_COND_TIMEOUT);
+ if (time_left == 0) {
atomic_set(&wait->cond, RTW89_WAIT_COND_IDLE);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
2.43.0