Re: [PATCH 1/3] cacheinfo: Add function to get cacheinfo for a given (cpu, cachelevel)

From: Reinette Chatre
Date: Mon Jun 03 2024 - 14:07:09 EST


Hi Tony,

On 5/31/24 12:57 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
Resctrl code open codes a search for information about a given cache
level in a couple of places (and more are on the way).

Provide a new inline function get_cpu_cacheinfo_level() in
<linux/cacheinfo.h> to do the search and return a pointer to
the cacheinfo structure.

Simplify the existing get_cpu_cacheinfo_id() by using this new
function to do the search.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
index 2cb15fe4fe12..301b0b24f446 100644
--- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
+++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
@@ -113,10 +113,10 @@ int acpi_get_cache_info(unsigned int cpu,
const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf);
/*
- * Get the id of the cache associated with @cpu at level @level.
+ * Get the cacheinfo structure for cache associated with @cpu at level @level.

"for cache" -> "for the cache"?

* cpuhp lock must be held.
*/
-static inline int get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(int cpu, int level)
+static inline struct cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(int cpu, int level)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
int i;
@@ -124,12 +124,23 @@ static inline int get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(int cpu, int level)
for (i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
if (ci->info_list[i].level == level) {
if (ci->info_list[i].attributes & CACHE_ID)
- return ci->info_list[i].id;
- return -1;
+ return &ci->info_list[i];
+ return NULL;
}
}
- return -1;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Get the id of the cache associated with @cpu at level @level.
+ * cpuhp lock must be held.
+ */
+static inline int get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(int cpu, int level)
+{
+ struct cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(cpu, level);
+
+ return ci ? ci->id : -1;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64

Just the one nitpick from me.
Thank you.

| Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>

Reinette