Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()

From: Z qiang
Date: Mon Jun 03 2024 - 22:26:21 EST

Next message: Yong-Xuan Wang: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] RISC-V: Detect and Enable Svadu Extension Support"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [maple-tree?] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in mas_walk"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 01:52:29PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
> > defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
> > will cause the following system panic:
>
> Nice change, thank you!
>
> There is one issue with it on large systems. Please see the comments
> near the end of this patch.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > [ 0.015349][ T0] smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> > ...
> > [ 0.021342][ T0] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
> > ...
> > [ 3.681252][ T15] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
> > [ 3.689415][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: debug port 2
> > [ 3.697008][ T15] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > [ 3.697009][ T15] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > [ 3.706233][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: irq 16, io mem 0xf7e3c000
> > [ 3.708152][ T15] PGD 40fa24067 P4D 40fa24067 PUD 40fa25063 PMD 410bff063
> > [ 3.720380][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
> > [ 3.720430][ T15] PTE 800ffffbefee3062
> > [ 3.720431][ T15] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> > [ 3.727873][ T45] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 6.06
> > [ 3.734009][ T15] CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W 6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
> > [ 3.734011][ T15] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 9020/005T15, BIOS A14 09/14/2015
> > [ 3.734012][ T15] RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> > [ 3.737962][ T45] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
> > [ 3.742877][ T15] RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
> > [ 3.751891][ T45] usb usb2: Product: EHCI Host Controller
> > [ 3.764495][ T15]
> > [ 3.764496][ T15] RAX: ffffffff98929ca0 RBX: ffffffff98b3b328 RCX: 0000000000021880
> > [ 3.764497][ T15] RDX: ffffffff9911c880 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> > [ 3.772461][ T45] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 6.6.21 ehci_hcd
> > [ 3.778248][ T15] RBP: 0000000000000202 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > [ 3.778249][ T15] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
> > [ 3.778249][ T15] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff98b3b320
> > [ 3.786216][ T45] usb usb2: SerialNumber: 0000:00:1a.0
> > [ 3.805811][ T15] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c781ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 3.805813][ T15] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 3.811993][ T45] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
> > [ 3.817383][ T15] CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> > [ 3.817385][ T15] Call Trace:
> > [ 3.817386][ T15] <TASK>
> > [ 3.817388][ T15] ? __die+0x23/0x80
> > [ 3.819643][ T45] hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
> > [ 3.827481][ T15] ? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
> > [ 3.827485][ T15] ? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
> > [ 3.922376][ T15] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
> > [ 3.927289][ T15] ? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> > [ 3.932459][ T15] ? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
> > [ 3.937806][ T15] rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
> > [ 3.942451][ T15] rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
> > [ 3.947096][ T15] kthread+0xe8/0x140
> > [ 3.950956][ T15] ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> > [ 3.955425][ T15] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
> > [ 3.959721][ T15] ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> > [ 3.964192][ T15] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
> > [ 3.968841][ T15] </TASK>
> >
> > Consider that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, this commit
> > use the maxcpu variable to store the CPU numbers after traversing
> > possible cpu, and generate the rcu_task_cpu_ids variable and assign
> > it to (maxcpu +1) instead of nr_cpu_ids.
> >
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> > Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > index e362f72bb65d..8428440e0fa4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> > @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ module_param(rcu_task_collapse_lim, int, 0444);
> > static int rcu_task_lazy_lim __read_mostly = 32;
> > module_param(rcu_task_lazy_lim, int, 0444);
> >
> > +static int rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> > +
> > /* RCU tasks grace-period state for debugging. */
> > #define RTGS_INIT 0
> > #define RTGS_WAIT_WAIT_CBS 1
> > @@ -245,6 +247,7 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> > int cpu;
> > int lim;
> > int shift;
> > + int maxcpu;
> >
> > if (rcu_task_enqueue_lim < 0) {
> > rcu_task_enqueue_lim = 1;
> > @@ -254,14 +257,6 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> > }
> > lim = rcu_task_enqueue_lim;
> >
> > - if (lim > nr_cpu_ids)
> > - lim = nr_cpu_ids;
> > - shift = ilog2(nr_cpu_ids / lim);
> > - if (((nr_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> > - shift++;
> > - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> > - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> > - smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
> >
> > @@ -277,10 +272,21 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks);
> > if (!rtpcp->rtp_exit_list.next)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
> > + maxcpu = cpu;
> > }
> >
> > - pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d.\n", rtp->name,
> > - data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim), rcu_task_cb_adjust);
> > + rcu_task_cpu_ids = maxcpu + 1;
> > + if (lim > rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> > + lim = rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> > + shift = ilog2(rcu_task_cpu_ids / lim);
> > + if (((rcu_task_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> > + shift++;
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> > + smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> > + pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d rcu_task_cpu_ids=%d.\n",
> > + rtp->name, data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim),
> > + rcu_task_cb_adjust, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> > }
> >
> > // Compute wakeup time for lazy callback timer.
> > @@ -348,7 +354,7 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
> > rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries = 0;
> > }
> > if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ++rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries > rcu_task_contend_lim &&
> > - READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != nr_cpu_ids)
> > + READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> > needadjust = true; // Defer adjustment to avoid deadlock.
> > }
> > // Queuing callbacks before initialization not yet supported.
> > @@ -368,10 +374,10 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> > if (unlikely(needadjust)) {
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> > - if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != nr_cpu_ids) {
> > + if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != rcu_task_cpu_ids) {
> > WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, 0);
> > - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> > - smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> > + smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> > pr_info("Switching %s to per-CPU callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
> > }
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> > @@ -481,7 +487,7 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> > if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ncbs <= rcu_task_collapse_lim) {
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> > if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim > 1) {
> > - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(nr_cpu_ids));
> > + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(rcu_task_cpu_ids));
> > smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, 1);
> > rtp->percpu_dequeue_gpseq = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
> > gpdone = false;
> > @@ -496,7 +502,9 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> > pr_info("Completing switch %s to CPU-0 callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
> > }
> > if (rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim == 1) {
> > - for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> > + for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < rcu_task_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> > + if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> > + continue;
> > struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist));
> > @@ -520,21 +528,15 @@ static void rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, struct rcu_tasks_percpu
> > struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
> > struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp_next;
> >
> > - cpu = rtpcp->cpu;
> > - cpunext = cpu * 2 + 1;
> > - if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
>
> The purpose here is to parallelize the callback invocation, which looks to
> me to be lost given the change below. This parallelization is important
> given that the Linux kernel runs on systems with thousands of CPUs.
> Admittedly not often, but we nevertheless do need to make Linux run well
> on such systems.
>
> But you are right that the parallelization assumed that per-CPU data
> existed for all CPUs from zero to the maximum-numbered CPU. Perhaps a
> good fix would be to make cblist_init_generic() construct a dense array
> containing the numbers of the possible CPUs, then index into that array
> to fan out the parallization.

Would it be easier like this?

for (cpu = 1; cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim); cpu++) {
if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
continue;
rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpu) ? cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
}

Thanks
Zqiang

>
> > + cpu = rtpcp->cpu + 1;
> > + if (cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> > + cpunext = cpumask_next(cpu - 1, cpu_possible_mask);
> > rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> > cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> > queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> > - cpunext++;
> > - if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> > - rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> > - cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> > - queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> > - }
> > }
> >
> > - if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) || !cpu_possible(cpu))
> > + if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist))
> > return;
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> > rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

Next message: Yong-Xuan Wang: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] RISC-V: Detect and Enable Svadu Extension Support"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [maple-tree?] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in mas_walk"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]