Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add SCIF support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Greg,

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:42:50AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:15:23AM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:45 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > This patch series updates DT binding doc and scif driver to add support
> > > > for the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC. RZ/V2H(P) SoC supports one channel SCIF
> > > > interface.
> > > >
> > > > v3->v4
> > > > - patch 2/4 reverted back to version 2
> > > > - new patch 3/5 added
> > > > - Added new reg type for RZ/V2H
> > > >
> > > > v2->v3
> > > > - Included DT validation patches
> > > > - Added a new compat string for RZ/V2H(P) SoC
> > > > - Added driver changes for RZ/V2H(P) SoC
> > > > - Listed interrupts and interrupt-names for every SoC in if check
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Prabhakar
> > > >
> > > > Lad Prabhakar (5):
> > > >   dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Move ref for serial.yaml at the end
> > > >   dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Validate 'interrupts' and
> > > >     'interrupt-names'
> > > >   dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Make 'interrupt-names' property as
> > > >     required
> > > >   dt-bindings: serial: Add documentation for Renesas RZ/V2H(P)
> > > >     (R9A09G057) SCIF support
> > > >   serial: sh-sci: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC
> > > >
> > > Gentle ping.
> >
> > It is only 3 days since the merge window ended, please be patient for
> > maintainers to catch up with their pending review queue.  Especially for
> > non-bugfixes like these that will be included in the 6.11-rc1 release,
> > there is not any rush here for anyone just yet.
> >
> > For example, my todo queue currently has 1458 emails to process in it,
> > this thread is somewhere in the middle.
> >
> > In the meantime, please help review other pending patches for the
> > subsystem to help enable your patches to move toward the top of the
> > queue.
>
> And this patch series does not even apply, so how could it be accepted?
>
Oops I'll rebase the changes now.

> Please fix and resend with the proper reviews added.
>
Sure will do.

Cheers,
Prabhakar