On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 12:41, Tomi Valkeinen
<tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ulf,
On 05/06/2024 12:34, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+ Tomi
On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 14:41, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
Since commit a47cf07f60dcb02d ("serial: core: Call
device_set_awake_path() for console port"), the serial driver properly
handles the case where the serial console is part of the awake path, and
it looked like we could start removing special serial console handling
from PM Domain drivers like the R-Mobile SYSC PM Domain driver.
Unfortunately the devil is in the details, as usual...
Earlycon relies on the serial port to be initialized by the firmware
and/or bootloader. Linux is not aware of any hardware dependencies that
must be met to keep the port working, and thus cannot guarantee they
stay met, until the full serial driver takes over.
E.g. all unused clocks and unused PM Domains are disabled in a late
initcall. As this happens after the full serial driver has taken over,
the serial port's clock and/or PM Domain are no longer deemed unused,
and this is typically not a problem.
However, if the serial port's clock or PM Domain is shared with another
device, and that other device is runtime-suspended before the full
serial driver has probed, the serial port's clock and/or PM Domain will
be disabled inadvertently. Any subsequent serial console output will
cause a crash or system lock-up. E.g. on R/SH-Mobile SoCs, the serial
ports share their PM Domain with several other I/O devices. After the
use of pwm (Armadillo-800-EVA) or i2c (KZM-A9-GT) during early boot,
before the full serial driver takes over, the PM Domain containing the
early serial port is powered down, causing a lock-up when booted with
"earlycon".
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the detailed description of the problem! As pointed out in
regards to another similar recent patch [1], this is indeed a generic
problem, not limited to the serial console handling.
At Linaro Connect a few weeks ago I followed up with Saravana from the
earlier discussions at LPC last fall. We now have a generic solution
for genpd drafted on plain paper, based on fw_devlink and the
->sync_state() callback. I am currently working on the genpd series,
while Saravana will re-spin the series (can't find the link to the
last version) for the clock framework. Ideally, we want these things
to work in a very similar way.
That said, allow me to post the series for genpd in a week or two to
see if it can solve your problem too, for the serial console.
Both the genpd and the clock solutions will make suppliers depend on all
their consumers to be probed, right?
I think it is a solution, and should be worked on, but it has the
drawback that suppliers that have consumers that will possibly never be
probed, will also never be able to turn off unused resources.
This was specifically the case with the TI ti-sci pmdomain case I was
looking at: the genpd driver (ti_sci_pm_domains.c) provides a lot of
genpds for totally unrelated devices, and so if, e.g., you don't have or
don't want to load a driver for the GPU, all PDs are affected.
Even here the solutions you mention will help: instead of things getting
broken because genpds get turned off while they are actually in use, the
genpds will be kept enabled, thus fixing the breakage. Unfortunately,
they'll be kept enabled forever.
I've been ill for quite a while so I haven't had the chance to look at
this more, but before that I was hacking around a bit with something I
named .partial_sync_state(). .sync_state() gets called when all the
consumers have probed, but .partial_sync_state() gets called when _a_
consumer has been probed.
For the .sync_state() things are easy for the driver, as it knows
everything related has been probed, but for .partial_sync_state() the
driver needs to track resources internally. .partial_sync_state() will
tell the driver that a consumer device has probed, the driver can then
find out which specific resources (genpds in my case) that consumer
refers to, and then... Well, that's how far I got with my hacks =).
So, I don't know if this .partial_sync_state() can even work, but I
think we do need something more on top of the .sync_state().
Thanks for the update!
You certainly have a point, but rather than implementing some platform
specific method, I think we should be able enforce the call to
->sync_state(), based upon some condition/timeout - and even if all
consumers haven't been probed.