Re: [RFC bpf-next 01/10] uprobe: Add session callbacks to uprobe_consumer

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 06/05, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> WDYT? It's still fast, and it's simpler than the shadow stack idea, IMO.

Andrii. I am alredy sleeping, I'll try to read your email tomorrow.
Right now I can only say that everything is simpler than the shadow stack ;)

> P.S. Regardless, maybe we should change the order in which we insert
> consumers to uprobe? Right now uprobe consumer added later will be
> executed first, which, while not wrong, is counter-intuitive.

Agreed...

Even if currently this doesn't really matter, I guess it is supposed
that uc->handler() is "non-intrusive".

Oleg.