Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024, 08:41:19 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:Yes, that's why I replied to the first message in the messed-up thread
On 05/06/2024 22:52, Alex Bee wrote:it looks like Alex had some mail trouble yesterday.
This series adds support for the Serial Flash Controller (SFC) found inDo not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
RK3128 SoCs.
As without using some "id holes" we would run out clock ids in the binding
and would have to touch the ABI, I added patches which removes the
CLK_NR_CLKS macro and uses the recently introduced
rockchip_clk_find_max_clk_id helper instead to find the highest clock id.
changes since v1:
- added patches to remove CLK_NR_CLKS (Connor)
or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
interfere with applying entire sets.
You sent now v2 immediately after. Confused.
The thread you Acked patches in actually is v2, just missing the label.
- original v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605172154.193047-1-knaerzche@xxxxxxxxx
- "unlabeled" v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605205209.232005-1-knaerzche@xxxxxxxxx/
- this as v2, but as reply to the previous
- real v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20240605210049.232284-1-knaerzche@xxxxxxxxx/
The last 3 are identical, just the sending process was somehow fumbled.