Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix Undefined Behavior Sanitizer(UBSAN) error

From: Moger, Babu
Date: Thu Jun 06 2024 - 11:13:00 EST




On 6/3/24 15:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 7:54 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> However, VM boots up fine without any issues and operational.
>>
>> Yes, the caller uses kvm_handle_hva_range() as if it returned void.
>>
>>> Ah, the "break" will only break out of the memslot loop, it won't break out of
>>> the address space loop. Stupid SMM.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> index b312d0cbe60b..70f5a39f8302 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>> range->on_lock(kvm);
>>>
>>> if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))
>>> - break;
>>> + goto mmu_unlock;
>>> }
>>> r.ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range);
>>> }
>>> @@ -660,6 +660,7 @@ static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>> if (range->flush_on_ret && r.ret)
>>> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>>>
>>> +mmu_unlock:
>>> if (r.found_memslot)
>>> KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
>>
>> Yep. If you want to just reply with Signed-off-by I'll mix the
>> original commit message and your patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Sean, Paolo.

I will send v2 with Sean's patch.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger