Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: cros-ec: Don't care about consumers in .get_state()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 10:44:15AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The get_state() callback is never called (in a visible way) after there
> is a consumer for a pwm device. The core handles loosing the information
> about duty_cycle just fine.
> 
> Simplify the driver accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 33 +--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> index 606ccfdaf4cc..ba4ee0b507b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> @@ -25,15 +25,6 @@
>  struct cros_ec_pwm_device {
>  	struct cros_ec_device *ec;
>  	bool use_pwm_type;
> -	struct cros_ec_pwm *channel;
> -};

I forgot to drop the kernel doc comment. Unless I get some feedback that
makes me send a v2, I'll squash the following into this patch when
applying:

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
index fcc33a2cb878..189301dc395e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
  *
  * @ec: Pointer to EC device
  * @use_pwm_type: Use PWM types instead of generic channels
- * @channel: array with per-channel data
  */
 struct cros_ec_pwm_device {
 	struct cros_ec_device *ec;

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature