[PATCH 9/9] x86/fpu: Fix stale comment in ex_handler_fprestore()

[Ingo Molnar]

The state -> fpstate rename of the fpu::fpstate field didn't
get propagated to the comment describing ex_handler_fprestore(),
fix it.

Reported-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 1359ad75da3a..bf8dab18be97 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static bool ex_handler_sgx(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 
 /*
  * Handler for when we fail to restore a task's FPU state.  We should never get
- * here because the FPU state of a task using the FPU (x86_task_fpu(task)->state)
+ * here because the FPU state of a task using the FPU (struct fpu::fpstate)
  * should always be valid.  However, past bugs have allowed userspace to set
  * reserved bits in the XSAVE area using PTRACE_SETREGSET or sys_rt_sigreturn().
  * These caused XRSTOR to fail when switching to the task, leaking the FPU
-- 
2.43.0