Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings:iio:proximity: Add hx9023s binding

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Jun 08 2024 - 13:02:12 EST


On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:57:58 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:41:37 +0800
> Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > A capacitive proximity sensor
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Yasin
>
> Some improvements but seems you missed some of the feedback on v3.
>
> See inline.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
> > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..50bf2849d823
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/proximity/tyhx,hx9023s.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: TYHX HX9023S capacitive proximity sensor
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Yasin Lee <yasin.lee.x@xxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > + TYHX HX9023S proximity sensor
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: /schemas/iio/iio.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: tyhx,hx9023s
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> A device like this needs at least one power supply. Make sure to document
> all such supplies and make the ones that are required for functionality part of
> your required properties. Note that you should do this even if on your
> board they are always turned on.

Ignore this for obvious reasons given you have just below! However should be
required.

>
> > +
> > + interrupts:
> > + description: |
> > + Generated by device to announce preceding read request has finished
> > + and data is available or that a close/far proximity event has happened.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + vdd-supply:
> > + true
> vdd-supply: true
>
> on single line is commonly done for these.
>
> > +
> > + channel-in-use:
> > + description: |
> > + Bit flag indicating which channels are used,
> > + depends on the hardware circuit design.
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>
> Presence of the channel nodes below should make this clear
> without a separate element.
>
>
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^channel@[0-9]+$":
> > + type: object
> > + properties:
> > + reg:
> > + description: Channel register address
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + channel-positive:
> > + description: Positive channel assignments
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>
> That size seems implausible. What are the limits. What does
> 255 mean?
>
> In review of previous version I pointed you at the differential
> channel bindings for ADCs. If they cannot be applied here
> explain why in your patch description.
>
> > + channel-negative:
> > + description: Negative channel assignments
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + required:
> > + - reg
> > + - channel-positive
> > + - channel-negative
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > + i2c {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + hx9023s@2a {
> > + compatible = "tyhx,hx9023s";
> > + reg = <0x2a>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
> > + interrupts = <16 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> > + vdd-supply = <&pp1800_prox>;
> > + channel-in-use = <0x1F>;
> > + channel@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + channel-positive = <0>;
> > + channel-negative = <255>;
> > + };
> > + channel@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + channel-positive = <1>;
> > + channel-negative = <255>;
> > + };
> > + channel@2 {
> > + reg = <2>;
> > + channel-positive = <2>;
> > + channel-negative = <255>;
> > + };
> > + channel@3 {
> > + reg = <3>;
> > + channel-positive = <3>;
> > + channel-negative = <255>;
> > + };
> > + channel@4 {
> > + reg = <4>;
> > + channel-positive = <4>;
> > + channel-negative = <255>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > index b97d298b3eb6..e2224eea9ab9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > @@ -1507,6 +1507,8 @@ patternProperties:
> > description: Turing Machines, Inc.
> > "^tyan,.*":
> > description: Tyan Computer Corporation
> > + "^tyhx,.*":
> > + description: NanjingTianyihexin Electronics Ltd.
>
> Use a separate patch for the new vendor prefix. Makes it easier for people to cherrypick that
> if they are backporting some other tyhx dt binding.
>
> > "^u-blox,.*":
> > description: u-blox
> > "^u-boot,.*":
>
>