Re: [syzbot] [serial?] possible deadlock in console_lock_spinning_enable (4)

From: Hillf Danton
Date: Sun Jun 09 2024 - 20:19:48 EST


On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:24:24 -0700
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 8867bbd4a056 mm: arm64: Fix the out-of-bounds issue in con..
> git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14d199ce980000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3b4350cf56c61c80
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0f558b549182d2711c75
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> userspace arch: arm64
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=11493bc2980000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=146cff16980000
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6ea21f50498b/disk-8867bbd4.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e2fed09364aa/vmlinux-8867bbd4.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4860173c7a18/Image-8867bbd4.gz.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+0f558b549182d2711c75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> sp0: Synchronizing with TNC
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0 Tainted: G W
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor196/6254 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff80008f1bcea0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x88/0xec kernel/printk/printk.c:1866
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff800093bc1c58 (&port_lock_key){....}-{2:2}, at: uart_port_lock_irqsave include/linux/serial_core.h:618 [inline]
> ffff800093bc1c58 (&port_lock_key){....}-{2:2}, at: uart_write+0x114/0x2ec drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:624
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&port_lock_key){....}-{2:2}:
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x7c kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
> uart_port_lock_irqsave include/linux/serial_core.h:618 [inline]
> pl011_console_write+0x148/0x724 drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c:2316
> console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2928 [inline]
> console_flush_all+0x5cc/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994
> console_unlock+0xec/0x3d4 kernel/printk/printk.c:3063
> vprintk_emit+0x1ec/0x350 kernel/printk/printk.c:2345
> vprintk_default+0xa0/0xe4 kernel/printk/printk.c:2360
> vprintk+0x200/0x2d4 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:45
> _printk+0xdc/0x128 kernel/printk/printk.c:2370
> register_console+0x700/0xa8c kernel/printk/printk.c:3596
> uart_configure_port drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:2664 [inline]
> serial_core_add_one_port drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3192 [inline]
> serial_core_register_port+0x1428/0x1bf4 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3429
> serial_ctrl_register_port+0x28/0x38 drivers/tty/serial/serial_ctrl.c:41
> uart_add_one_port+0x28/0x38 drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c:136
> pl011_register_port+0x1b4/0x44c drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c:2744
> sbsa_uart_probe+0x488/0x608 drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c:2914
> platform_probe+0x148/0x1c0 drivers/base/platform.c:1404
> really_probe+0x38c/0x8fc drivers/base/dd.c:656
> __driver_probe_device+0x194/0x374 drivers/base/dd.c:798
> driver_probe_device+0x78/0x330 drivers/base/dd.c:828
> __device_attach_driver+0x2a8/0x4f4 drivers/base/dd.c:956
> bus_for_each_drv+0x228/0x2bc drivers/base/bus.c:457
> __device_attach+0x2b4/0x434 drivers/base/dd.c:1028
> device_initial_probe+0x24/0x34 drivers/base/dd.c:1077
> bus_probe_device+0x178/0x240 drivers/base/bus.c:532
> device_add+0x728/0xa6c drivers/base/core.c:3721
> platform_device_add+0x3e8/0x6e8 drivers/base/platform.c:716
> platform_device_register_full+0x4ec/0x604 drivers/base/platform.c:844
> acpi_create_platform_device+0x5bc/0x744 drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c:177
> acpi_default_enumeration+0x6c/0xdc drivers/acpi/scan.c:2184
> acpi_bus_attach+0x8b8/0xaa8 drivers/acpi/scan.c:2293
> acpi_dev_for_one_check+0xa0/0xb4 drivers/acpi/bus.c:1143
> device_for_each_child+0xec/0x174 drivers/base/core.c:4050
> acpi_dev_for_each_child+0xc4/0x108 drivers/acpi/bus.c:1155
> acpi_bus_attach+0x358/0xaa8 drivers/acpi/scan.c:2298
> acpi_dev_for_one_check+0xa0/0xb4 drivers/acpi/bus.c:1143
> device_for_each_child+0xec/0x174 drivers/base/core.c:4050
> acpi_dev_for_each_child+0xc4/0x108 drivers/acpi/bus.c:1155
> acpi_bus_attach+0x358/0xaa8 drivers/acpi/scan.c:2298
> acpi_bus_scan+0x118/0x4f0 drivers/acpi/scan.c:2579
> acpi_scan_init+0x214/0x6b0 drivers/acpi/scan.c:2714
> acpi_init+0x190/0x254 drivers/acpi/bus.c:1460
> do_one_initcall+0x254/0x9e4 init/main.c:1267
> do_initcall_level+0x154/0x214 init/main.c:1329
> do_initcalls+0x58/0xac init/main.c:1345
> do_basic_setup+0x8c/0xa0 init/main.c:1364
> kernel_init_freeable+0x324/0x478 init/main.c:1578
> kernel_init+0x24/0x2a0 init/main.c:1467
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860
>
> -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
> lock_acquire+0x248/0x73c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
> console_lock_spinning_enable+0xb4/0xec kernel/printk/printk.c:1870
> console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2922 [inline]
> console_flush_all+0x58c/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994
> console_unlock+0xec/0x3d4 kernel/printk/printk.c:3063
> vprintk_emit+0x1ec/0x350 kernel/printk/printk.c:2345
> vprintk_default+0xa0/0xe4 kernel/printk/printk.c:2360
> vprintk+0x200/0x2d4 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:45
> _printk+0xdc/0x128 kernel/printk/printk.c:2370
> __report_bug lib/bug.c:195 [inline]
> report_bug+0x3b8/0x5b0 lib/bug.c:219
> bug_handler+0x50/0x1fc arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:978
> call_break_hook arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:321 [inline]
> brk_handler+0x17c/0x2e0 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:328
> do_debug_exception+0x1e4/0x398 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:909
> el1_dbg+0x64/0x80 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:472
> el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0xac arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:512
> el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:593
> spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock.h:406 [inline]
> uart_port_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/serial_core.h:669 [inline]

in include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
{
spin_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
do_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
preempt_enable();
}

Because spin_release() goes before restoring local irq, the port_lock
should have been ruled out of lockdep that triggered this report. But
it was delivered to lore.

> uart_write+0x280/0x2ec drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:626
> tnc_init drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:531 [inline]
> sixpack_open+0x5d8/0x8b0 drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:628
> tty_ldisc_open+0x9c/0x14c drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:432
> tty_set_ldisc+0x2f8/0x4e0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:563
> tiocsetd+0x100/0x13c drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2439
> tty_ioctl+0xba0/0xd8c drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2739
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:893 [inline]
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:893
> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline]
> invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
> el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133
> do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152
> el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
> el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&port_lock_key);
> lock(console_owner);
> lock(&port_lock_key);
> lock(console_owner);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***