Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: don't indicate PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE without PM_PRESENT

From: Oscar Salvador
Date: Tue Jun 11 2024 - 07:16:06 EST

Next message: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis): "Re: Segfault running a binary in a compressed folder"
Previous message: Alexander Stein: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] arm64: dts: imx8: add basic mipi subsystem"
In reply to: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: don't indicate PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE without PM_PRESENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:50:46PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I *think* we still want that for indicating PM_FILE after patch #1.

Yes, we do, disregard that comment please.

--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs

Next message: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis): "Re: Segfault running a binary in a compressed folder"
Previous message: Alexander Stein: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] arm64: dts: imx8: add basic mipi subsystem"
In reply to: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: don't indicate PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE without PM_PRESENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]