Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:38:23PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> The handler is registered with sigaction(), not sigprocmask(). Even if the
> purpose of writing sigprocmask() here was to mention blocked signals, the
> statement currently concerns the "addition" of blocked signals; signals
> blocked through sigprocmask() would already be present in the thread
> context of blocked signals.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature