Re: [PATCH] Supports to use the default CMA when the device-specified CMA memory is not enough.

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Jun 12 2024 - 03:20:13 EST


On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:38:31AM +0800, zhai.he wrote:
> From: He Zhai <zhai.he@xxxxxxx>
>
> In the current code logic, if the device-specified CMA memory
> allocation fails, memory will not be allocated from the default CMA area.
> This patch will use the default cma region when the device's
> specified CMA is not enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: He Zhai <zhai.he@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 11 +++++++++--
> mm/cma.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> index 055da410ac71..e45cfb24500f 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> @@ -357,8 +357,13 @@ struct page *dma_alloc_contiguous(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> /* CMA can be used only in the context which permits sleeping */
> if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> return NULL;
> - if (dev->cma_area)
> - return cma_alloc_aligned(dev->cma_area, size, gfp);
> + if (dev->cma_area) {
> + struct page *page = NULL;
> +
> + page = cma_alloc_aligned(dev->cma_area, size, gfp);
> + if (page)
> + return page;
> + }
> if (size <= PAGE_SIZE)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -406,6 +411,8 @@ void dma_free_contiguous(struct device *dev, struct page *page, size_t size)
> if (dev->cma_area) {
> if (cma_release(dev->cma_area, page, count))
> return;
> + if (cma_release(dma_contiguous_default_area, page, count))
> + return;
> } else {
> /*
> * otherwise, page is from either per-numa cma or default cma
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 3e9724716bad..f225b3f65bd2 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count,
> }
>
> if (ret && !no_warn) {
> - pr_err_ratelimited("%s: %s: alloc failed, req-size: %lu pages, ret: %d\n",
> + pr_debug("%s: %s: alloc failed, req-size: %lu pages, ret: %d, try to use default cma\n",
> __func__, cma->name, count, ret);

Why did you change the error level here?

And when you use pr_debug(), you NEVER need to use __func__, as it is
already included automatically in the message output. So now you have
it twice :)

thanks,

greg k-h