Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/mipi-dsi: fix handling of ctx in mipi_dsi_msleep

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 6:37 AM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ctx would be better off treated as a pointer to account for most of its
> usage so far, and brackets should be added to account for operator
> precedence for correct evaluation.
>
> Fixes: f79d6d28d8fe7 ("drm/mipi-dsi: wrap more functions for streamline handling")
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Yeah. Looking closer at the history, it looks like it was always
intended to be a pointer since the first users all used it as a
pointer.

Suggested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've also compile-tested all the panels currently using mipi_dsi_msleep().

Neil: Given that this is a correctness thing, I'd rather see this land
sooner rather than later. If you agree, maybe you can land these two
patches whenever you're comfortable with them?


-Doug