Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add R9A09G057 core clocks
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Jun 13 2024 - 11:16:07 EST
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:56 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13/06/2024 11:57, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> of section 4.4.2 which cannot be controlled by CLKON register.
> >>> ---
> >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/r9a09g057-cpg.h
> >>
> >> Missing vendor prefix.
> >>
> > OK, Is this just for new includes being added, or do you want me to
> > rename the existing Renesas specific includes in here which dont have
> > vendor prefix?
>
> Didn't we discuss it?
>
> I commented only about this binding.
Yes we did, in the context of the R-Car V4M DT binding definitions,
which became include/dt-bindings/clock/renesas,r8a779h0-cpg-mssr.h
But Prabhakar was not involved there.
Note that I also asked to include the vendor prefix, see
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/CAMuHMdU7+O-+v=2V83AjQmTWyGy_a-AHgU_nPMDHnVUtYt89iQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds