Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Marion & Christophe JAILLET]

Le 13/06/2024 à 21:43, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> > > let's be a bit more organized about it?
> > Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
> > assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.
> No probs.  If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
> brain cell is unreliable :(

I guess, that the author is me.

in my .gitconfig, I use

[sendemail.linux]
    tocmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nol"
    cccmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nom"

and

>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol 
fs/proc/generic.c
[EMPTY OUTPUT]

>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol 
fs/proc/generic.c
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Should MAINTAINERS be updated somewhere?


(sorry for the mess I've generated :( )


CJ


> It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.