Re: [PATCH] ufs: Add table lookup to set d_type based on mode & S_IFMT

From: Al Viro
Date: Thu Jun 13 2024 - 19:17:34 EST


On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:40:47PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> should've raised an arseload of mental red flags. That loop is
> bloody ridiculous, even if you don't bother to check what other
> similar filesystems actually do in the counterpart of that logics.
>
> "Table lookup" does *NOT* refer to that. What you've got is strictly
> worse than the original switch, and that takes some doing.
>
> NAK.

Note, BTW, that for DT_... values are exactly the same as bits 12..15 of
mode_t. That's not accidental. So for valid mode values it's simply

{
if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_DE_MASK) == UFS_DE_44BSD)
de->d_u.d_44.d_type = (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12;
}

The 'mode' argument is always inode->i_mode for some inode. Two possible
variants: put validation into ufs_set_inode_ops() and make it fail when
the type is bad (note that init_special_inode() will already scream bloody
murder in that case) or put the validation in ufs_set_de_type() - that
would be

{
if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_DE_MASK) == UFS_DE_44BSD) {
unsigned char v = (mode & S_IFMT) >> 12;
switch (v) {
case DT_REG: case DT_DIR: case DT_LNK: case DT_SOCK:
case DT_CHR: case DT_BLK: case DT_FIFO:
break;
default:
v = DT_UNKNOWN;
}
de->d_u.d_44.d_type = v;
}
}

The first variant has a potential weakness - you might be unable to
unlink() junk on corrupted filesystem, but then you really don't
want to do that; it's likely to be not only thing that got corrupted
there.