Re: [PATCH v5] block: Add ioprio to block_rq tracepoint

[Bart Van Assche]

On 6/14/24 12:49 AM, Dongliang Cui wrote:
> -	TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u [%d]",
> +	TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u %s,%u,%u [%d]",
>   		  MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
>   		  __entry->rwbs, __get_str(cmd),
> -		  (unsigned long long)__entry->sector,
> -		  __entry->nr_sector, 0)
> +		  (unsigned long long)__entry->sector, __entry->nr_sector,
> +		  __print_symbolic(IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(__entry->ioprio),
> +				   IOPRIO_CLASS_STRINGS),
> +		  IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(__entry->ioprio),
> +		  IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(__entry->ioprio),  0)
>   );

Do we really want to include the constant "[0]" in the tracing output?

Otherwise this patch looks good to me.

Thanks,

Bart.