Re: [PATCH] bpf/selftests: Fix __NR_uretprobe in uprobe_syscall test

[Google]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:15:09 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Fixing the __NR_uretprobe number in uprobe_syscall test,
> because it changed due to merge conflict.
> 

Ah, it is not enough, since Stephen's change is just a temporary fix on
next tree. OK, Let me update it.

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
>  }
>  
>  #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
>  #endif
>  
>  __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> -- 
> 2.45.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>