Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: stm32-timers: Drop TIM_DIER_CC_IE(x) in favour of TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)

[William Breathitt Gray]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:10:13AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> These two defines have the same purpose and this change doesn't
> introduce any differences in drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.o.
> 
> The only difference between the two is that
> 
> 	TIM_DIER_CC_IE(1) == TIM_DIER_CC2IE
> 
> while
> 
> 	TIM_DIER_CCxIE(1) == TIM_DIER_CC1IE
> 
> . That makes it necessary to have an explicit "+ 1" in the user code,
> but IMHO this is a good thing as this is the code locatation that
> "knows" that for software channel 1 you have to use TIM_DIER_CC2IE
> (because software guys start counting at 0, while the relevant hardware
> designer started at 1).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I concur with Lee Jones that the subject should be renamed. Regardless,
here's my ack for the code changes.

Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature