Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] signal.7: Fix wrong mention of sigprocmask
From: Alejandro Colomar
Date: Mon Jun 17 2024 - 07:00:47 EST
Hi Dev, Mark,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:06:31PM GMT, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 02:38:23PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> > The handler is registered with sigaction(), not sigprocmask(). Even if the
> > purpose of writing sigprocmask() here was to mention blocked signals, the
> > statement currently concerns the "addition" of blocked signals; signals
> > blocked through sigprocmask() would already be present in the thread
> > context of blocked signals.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the patch and the review! I've applied the patch. It will
be included in the man-pages-6.9.1 release later today.
Have a lovely day!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature