Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: don't check page lru flag before draining it

From: yangge1116
Date: Mon Jun 17 2024 - 07:25:43 EST




在 2024/6/17 下午5:52, David Hildenbrand 写道:
Why would we want to make folio_maybe_dma_pinned() detection that worse

Just want to fix it using the existing function, seems a little unreasonable. I will prepare the V2 using folio_test_lru(folio) to check.

static unsigned long collect_longterm_unpinnable_pages(...)
{
...
if (!folio_test_lru(folio) && drain_allow) {
lru_add_drain_all();
drain_allow = false;
}
...
}

void folio_mark_lazyfree(struct folio *folio)
{
if (folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
!folio_test_swapcache(folio) && !folio_test_unevictable(folio)) {
struct folio_batch *fbatch;

folio_get(folio);
if (!folio_test_clear_lru(folio)) {
folio_put(folio);
return;
}

local_lock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_fbatches.lru_lazyfree);
folio_batch_add_and_move(fbatch, folio, lru_lazyfree_fn);
local_unlock(&cpu_fbatches.lock);
}
}