Re: [PATCH 09/15] net: hbl_en: add habanalabs Ethernet driver

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:37:36 +0000
Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 
> > Is there any reason in particular to call netif_receive_skb instead of
> > napi_gro_receive ?
> >   
> 
> As you can see, we also support polling mode which is a non-NAPI flow.
> We could use napi_gro_receive() for NAPI flow and netif_receive_skb() for
> polling mode but we don't support RX checksum offload anyway.

 Why non-NAPI? I thought current netdev policy was all drivers should
use NAPI.