Re: [PATCH v8 05/10] block: Add core atomic write support

[John Garry]

On 19/06/2024 09:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:59:33AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> > In this case, I would expect NOIOB >= atomic write boundary.
> >
> > Would it be sane to have a NOIOB < atomic write boundary in some other
> > config?
> >
> > I can support these possibilities, but the code will just get more complex.
> I'd be tempted to simply not support the case where NOIOB is not a
> multiple of the atomic write boundary for now and disable atomic writes
> with a big fat warning (and a good comment in the soure code).  If users
> show up with a device that hits this and want to use atomic writes we
> can resolved it.

Fine by me.