Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Add at24,mac02e4 and at24,mac02e6

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:22:31AM +0300, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Update regex check and add pattern to match both EEPROMs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Simion <andrei.simion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
> index 3c36cd0510de..46daa662f6e7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ select:
>    properties:
>      compatible:
>        contains:
> -        pattern: "^atmel,(24(c|cs|mac)[0-9]+|spd)$"
> +        pattern: "^atmel,(24(c|cs|mac)[0-9]+[a-z0-9]*|spd)$"

Could we relax the pattern instead to make this bloat less? Would it be
problematic to just allow "^atmel,(24(c|cs|mac)[a-z0-9]+|spd)$"?

>    required:
>      - compatible
>  
> @@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ properties:
>        - allOf:
>            - minItems: 1
>              items:
> -              - pattern: "^(atmel|catalyst|microchip|nxp|ramtron|renesas|rohm|st),(24(c|cs|lc|mac)[0-9]+|spd)$"
> -              - pattern: "^atmel,(24(c|cs|mac)[0-9]+|spd)$"
> +              - pattern: "^(atmel|catalyst|microchip|nxp|ramtron|renesas|rohm|st),(24(c|cs|lc|mac)[0-9]+[a-z0-9]*|spd)$"
> +              - pattern: "^atmel,(24(c|cs|mac)[0-9]+[a-z0-9]*|spd)$"
>            - oneOf:
>                - items:
>                    pattern: c00$
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ properties:
>                    pattern: mac402$
>                - items:
>                    pattern: mac602$
> +              - items:
> +                  pattern: mac02e4$
> +              - items:
> +                  pattern: mac02e6$
>                - items:
>                    pattern: c04$
>                - items:
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature