Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] spi: Enable controllers to extend the SPI protocol with MOSI idle configuration
From: Marcelo Schmitt
Date: Thu Jun 20 2024 - 10:28:31 EST
On 06/19, David Lechner wrote:
> On 6/18/24 6:10 PM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -3928,7 +3934,8 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> > * so it is ignored here.
> > */
> > bad_bits = spi->mode & ~(spi->controller->mode_bits | SPI_CS_WORD |
> > - SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX);
> > + SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX | SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW |
> > + SPI_MOSI_IDLE_HIGH);
>
> This looks wrong to me. Adding flags here causes them to be ignored
> rather than to be checked.
>
> I also did a runtime check with a random driver and a SPI controller
> that does not have the flag.
>
> spi->mode |= SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW;
> ret = spi_setup(spi);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> It incorrectly passes when used with this change but correctly fails
> without this change.
That's right, adding flags to bad_bits makes spi_setup() ignore those mode bits
instead of failing when they don't match.
Changed bad_bits assignment back to what it was in v3 (i.e. no change to bad_bits).
bad_bits = spi->mode & ~(spi->controller->mode_bits | SPI_CS_WORD |
SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX);
>
> > ugly_bits = bad_bits &
> > (SPI_TX_DUAL | SPI_TX_QUAD | SPI_TX_OCTAL |
> > SPI_RX_DUAL | SPI_RX_QUAD | SPI_RX_OCTAL);
>