Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) instead of TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Lee,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:38:38PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Which patches need to be in the pull-request and which can be hoovered
> up by their associated subsystems?

The dependencies are as follows:

	#1 <- #2 <- #3 <- #4
	       ^
	      #5

So the practical options are (in the order of my not very strong preference):

 - Immutable branch with #1 - #4 (assuming William is ok to let you
   merge #3), and then I can add #5 (and further work on the pwm-stm32
   driver that I'm currently working on). Maybe William even doesn't
   need to pull; I didn't check.

 - Immutable branch with only #1 and #2. Then William can pull and add
   #3 and I can pull and add #5. #4 can be applied later then.
   (I can remind about #4 in the next cycle.)

 - Immutable branch with #1 - #5
   (Reminder: In that case please fixup the pwm patch's short log with
   s/-/: /)
   I would add this for sure to the pwm tree. I didn't even try to check
   if it's needed for mfd and/or counter. So if you don't need it, I
   volunteer to create that branch, but if you want to do it, that's
   just fine, too.

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature