Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5: Add support for q6 rmb registers

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Thu Jun 20 2024 - 17:39:11 EST


On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 05:31:41PM GMT, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> From: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When attaching a running Q6, the remoteproc driver needs a way
> to communicate with the Q6 using rmb registers, so allow the
> rmb register to be gotten from the device tree if present.

rmb or RMB? And what is it?

>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> index 5a859c41896e..95824d5b64ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/qcom_aoss.h>
>
> +#define RMB_BOOT_WAIT_REG 0x8
> +#define RMB_BOOT_CONT_REG 0xC
> +#define RMB_Q6_BOOT_STATUS_REG 0x10
> +
> +#define RMB_POLL_MAX_TIMES 250
> +
> struct icc_path;
> struct rproc;
> struct qcom_smem_stat;
> @@ -16,6 +22,8 @@ struct qcom_q6v5 {
> struct device *dev;
> struct rproc *rproc;
>
> + void __iomem *rmb_base;
> +

Why is this a part of the common structure and is not a part of the _pas
struct?

> struct qcom_smem_state *state;
> struct qmp *qmp;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 8458bcfe9e19..b9759f6b2283 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,10 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto free_rproc;
> adsp->proxy_pd_count = ret;
>
> + adsp->q6v5.rmb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "rmb");
> + if (IS_ERR(adsp->q6v5.rmb_base))
> + adsp->q6v5.rmb_base = NULL;
> +
> ret = qcom_q6v5_init(&adsp->q6v5, pdev, rproc, desc->crash_reason_smem, desc->load_state,
> qcom_pas_handover);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.42.0
>

--
With best wishes
Dmitry