Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] kbuild: buildtar: Add explicit 32-bit arm support

[Calvin Owens]

On Friday 06/21 at 07:55 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Calvin,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:25:59PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > Implement buildtar for 32-bit arm, so the zImage (or xipimage) appears
> > at boot/vmlinuz-$foo, rather than at boot/vmlinux-kbuild-$foo, matching
> > the structure of the tar-pkg on arm64 and other architectures.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZhmKzqxHXaSZmXee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  scripts/package/buildtar | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/package/buildtar b/scripts/package/buildtar
> > index eb67787f8673..23d7ff675396 100755
> > --- a/scripts/package/buildtar
> > +++ b/scripts/package/buildtar
> > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ case "${ARCH}" in
> >  				cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinux-${KERNELRELEASE}";;
> >  		esac
> >  		;;
> > +	arm)
> > +		[ -f "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" ] && cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE}"
> > +		;;
> >  	*)
> >  		cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE}"
> >  		;;
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> > 
> 
> Is this change necessary after commit 2b1ab1405068 ("kbuild: buildtar:
> remove warning for the default case")? Without the '[ -f ... ] &&' part
> of the expression, which was removed for other cases in
> commit c3f7bed8fa14 ("kbuild: buildtar: add comments about inconsistent
> package generation"), it appears to be the same thing.

Oops. Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Calvin

> Cheers,
> Nathan