Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: ti: am645-system-controller: add child nodes used by main domain
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Jun 25 2024 - 12:11:06 EST
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:23:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.06.24 18:24, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:20:49AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Expand bindings to cover both the MCU and the main usage of the AM654
> >> system controller.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> index e79803e586ca..0eec807f38df 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,am654-system-controller.yaml
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,35 @@ patternProperties:
> >> type: object
> >> $ref: /schemas/phy/ti,phy-gmii-sel.yaml#
> >>
> >> + "^mux-controller$":
> >> + type: object
> >> + description:
> >> + This is the SERDES lane control mux.
> >
> > Where is this object described?
> >
>
> Nowhere so far - I've only followed the pattern in
> mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml. Would adding "ref:
> /schemas/mux/reg-mux.yaml" be enough?
I think that would be okay, yea
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature