Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

[Jisheng Zhang]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:19:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25 2024 at 15:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:33:25: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq'
> >    33 | static void __irq_entry dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)

I will try to fix it. I tested arm/arm64, but didn't try x86 :(

Thanks for the information.

> >       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:15:
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c: In function 'dw_apb_ictl_init':
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:206:32: error: 'dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'dw_apb_ictl_init'?
> >   206 |                 set_handle_irq(dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq);
> >       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/irq.h:1331:23: note: in definition of macro 'set_handle_irq'
> >  1331 |                 (void)handle_irq;               \
> >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~
> > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:206:32: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >   206 |                 set_handle_irq(dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq);
> >       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/irq.h:1331:23: note: in definition of macro 'set_handle_irq'
> >  1331 |                 (void)handle_irq;               \
> >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   7cc4f309c933ec5d ("irqchip/dw-apb-ictl: Support building as module")
> >
> > (I think, I didn't specifically verify.)  I have used the tree from
> > 20240624 instead.
> 
> It comes from irq/core. It'll be gone tomorrow.