Re: [PATCH] bpf: defer printk() inside __bpf_prog_run()

[Tetsuo Handa]

On 2024/06/27 8:52, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> Sorry, but it makes no sense to put the burden of the
>>> printk_deferred_enter() on the BPF hook logic. It should sit solely
>>> with the code that actually calls printk().
>>
>> How do you respond to Petr Mladek's comment
>>
>>   Yeah, converting printk() into printk_deferred() or using
>>   printk_deferred_enter() around particular code paths is a whac-a-mole
>>   game.
> 
> Exactly. wrapping bpf with printk_deferred_enter() is such a whac-a-mole.
> It doesn't fix an issue.

Then, what change do you propose?