Re: [RFC 1/1] swiotlb: Reduce calls to swiotlb_find_pool()

[hch@xxxxxx]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:59:03PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> Conceptually, it's still being used as a boolean function based on
> whether the return value is NULL.  Renaming it to swiotlb_get_pool()
> more accurately describes the return value, but obscures the
> intent of determining if it is a swiotlb buffer.  I'll think about it.
> Suggestions are welcome.

Just keep is_swiotlb_buffer as a trivial inline helper that returns
bool.