On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:38:34PM GMT, Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yes, sorry for losing it.
Thanks for your advice. It's indeed more appropriate to use "flush" insteadI saw your v2. Didn't you forget to change also the function name?
of "cancel" here, I will change it soon.
Yes.
I didn't quite get what you mean. Do you mean this patch will cause a changeI mean -- can the new mechanics be exploited to bypass throttling by
in mechanics, and it is necessary to add an explanation?
(After deleting the original cgroup,
Before: the limit of the throttled bios can't be changed and the bios will
complete under this limit;
Now: the limit will be canceled and the throttled bios will be flushed
immediately.)
sending IO from a process, migrate it between cgroups and rmdir them?
That should be covered in the commit log.
Thanks,
Michal