Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] netdevice: convert private flags > BIT(31) to bitfields

[Alexander Lobakin]

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:55:41 -0700

> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:50:40 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>> I don't think we should group them indiscriminately. Better to add the
>>> asserts flag by flag. Neither of the flags you're breaking out in this
>>> patch are used on the fast path.
>>>
>>> Or is the problem that CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER doesn't work on
>>> bitfields?  
>>
>> It generates sizeof(bitfield) which the compilers don't like and don't
>> want to compile ._.
> 
> Mm. Okay, I have no better ideas then.
> 
> Do consider moving the cold flags next to wol_enabled, tho?

Hmm, sounds good!

Thanks,
Olek