Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix lookup_address() to handle physical memory holes in direct mapping
From: Kalra, Ashish
Date: Mon Jul 01 2024 - 15:39:47 EST
On 7/1/2024 2:13 PM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 13:59 -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>> Then what is the caller supposed to do in this case ?
>>
>> As the return from lookup_address() is non-NULL in this case, accessing it
>> causes a fatal #PF.
>>
>> Is the caller supposed to add the check for a valid PTE using pte_none(*pte) ?
> I did a quick look at the callers, and some do their own check for pte_none().
> But some don't. Some also assume the return can't be NULL.
>
> Can you elaborate on your goal for this change? Just a cleanup?
Hit this issue while implementing and testing SNP guest kexec.
So trying to understand if need a generic fix for this issue or do i need to add my own check for pte_none() ?
Thanks, Ashish