Re: [PATCH 01/10] fs: turn inode ctime fields into a single ktime_t

[Jeff Layton]

On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 00:37 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 08:22:07PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > 2) the filesystem has been altered (fuzzing? deliberate doctoring?).
> > 
> > None of these seem like legitimate use cases so I'm arguing that we
> > shouldn't worry about them.
> 
> Not worry seems like the wrong answer here.  Either we decide they
> are legitimate enough and we preserve them, or we decide they are
> bogus and refuse reading the inode.  But we'll need to consciously
> deal with the case.
> 

Is there a problem with consciously dealing with it by clamping the
time at KTIME_MAX? If I had a fs with corrupt timestamps, the last
thing I'd want is the filesystem refusing to let me at my data because
of them.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>