Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On July 2, 2024 3:57:27 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 08:24:44PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
brcmf_fil_cmd_int_get() reads the value of 'io_type' and passes it to
brcmf_fil_cmd_data_get(). Initialize 'io_type' to avoid garbage value.
Since you're going to be resending anyway, please delete the space char
from the start of the line.
It's weird that brcmf_fil_cmd_data_get() uses the uninitialized data.
It looks like it just goes to great lengths to preserve the original
data in io_type... So it likely is harmless enough but still a strange
and complicated way write a no-op.
Not sure if it helps, but I tried to explain the reason in response to
patch 0 (cover letter).
Would it make more sense to have just one patch? It's the same issue
anyway.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature