Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: hv: vmbus: Add missing check for dma_set_mask in vmbus_device_register()

[Markus Elfring]

> child_device_obj->device cannot perform DMA properly if dma_set_mask()
> returns non-zero. …

Can the repetition of another wording suggestion influence the software evolution?
  Direct memory access can not be properly performed any more
  after a dma_set_mask() call failed.


See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc6/source/kernel/dma/mapping.c#L804


…
> Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <make24@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Under which circumstances will applications of the Developer's Certificate of Origin
be reconsidered any more (after three different names were presented so far)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc6#n398


Would you like to append parentheses to another function name in the summary phrase?

Regards,
Markus