Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ OLB system-controller

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 06:11:49PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> This is a new iteration on the Mobileye system-controller series [0].
> It has been split into separate series to facilitate merging.
> 
> This series contains a dt-bindings defining the system-controller
> (called OLB) used on EyeQ5, EyeQ6L and EyeQ6H. It then modifies the
> EyeQ5 devicetree to exploit that system-controller.
> 
> The last patch adds entries in MAINTAINERS for all related files. This
> is done in a single commit to avoid conflicts across trees.
> 
> Related series are targeted at clk [1], reset [2] and pinctrl [3].
> 
> Have a nice day,
> Théo
> 
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240620-mbly-olb-v3-0-5f29f8ca289c@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240628-mbly-clk-v1-0-edb1e29ea4c1@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240628-mbly-reset-v1-0-2a8294fd4392@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240628-mbly-pinctrl-v1-0-c878192d6b0a@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since OLB v3 [0]:
>  - MAINTAINERS: Move changes into a separate commit to avoid merge
>    conflicts. This commit is in the present series.
>  - dt-bindings: Take Reviewed-by: Rob Herring.
> 
> ---
> Théo Lebrun (3):
>       dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: add EyeQ OLB system controller
>       MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add OLB system-controller node
>       MAINTAINERS: Mobileye: add OLB drivers and dt-bindings
> 
>  .../bindings/soc/mobileye/mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml  | 374 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                        |   5 +
>  .../{eyeq5-fixed-clocks.dtsi => eyeq5-clocks.dtsi} |  54 +--
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/mobileye/eyeq5-pins.dtsi        | 125 +++++++
>  arch/mips/boot/dts/mobileye/eyeq5.dtsi             |  22 +-
>  5 files changed, 541 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

series applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]