Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] devres: Simplify devm_percpu_match() implementation

From: quic_zijuhu
Date: Thu Jul 04 2024 - 09:17:49 EST


On 7/4/2024 6:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:51:53PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> Simplify devm_percpu_match() implementation by removing redundant
>> conversions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Previous discussion link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1719496036-24642-1-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Changes since the original one:
>> - Select the simplier solution
>>
>> drivers/base/devres.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/devres.c b/drivers/base/devres.c
>> index e9b0d94aeabd..2ad6dacb3472 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/devres.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/devres.c
>> @@ -1176,9 +1176,8 @@ static void devm_percpu_release(struct device *dev, void *pdata)
>>
>> static int devm_percpu_match(struct device *dev, void *data, void *p)
>> {
>> - struct devres *devr = container_of(data, struct devres, data);
>> -
>> - return *(void **)devr->data == p;
>> + /* @data is already and must be (void *)devr->data */
>> + return *(void **)data == p;
>
> The compiler output should be identical here, right? And container_of()
yes, you are right.
> enforces the placement so I'd prefer the original here as a comment
> isn't going to enforce anything :)
>
i would like to show 2 different points related to the comments below:

1) the comments is applicable for *ALL* kinds of devres match()s, and is
*NOT* specific to devm_percpu_match() and also does *NOT* enforce anything.

may i remove the comments?

2) the original implementation is *NOT* normative as explained below:
include/linux/device.h:
typedef int (*dr_match_t)(struct device *dev, void *res, void *match_data);
void *devres_find(struct device *dev, dr_release_t release,
dr_match_t match, void *match_data);

devres API users maybe need to write their match() functions, for
example, user of API devres_find(), but struct devres is a devres
internal implementation defined within devres.c and is *NOT* exposed to
API user by device.h, so API user should not use struct devres when
implement their devres match() normally.
but original devm_percpu_match() uses the struct devres.

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h